Turn a folder of case files into a working theory of the case
Case Intelligence converts case files into structured understanding — facts, timelines, legal theories, strengths, weaknesses, and risks — so you can interrogate the case, not just read it.
The case is only as strong as your map of it
New matters arrive as boxes of documents. Building the timeline, reconciling contradicting accounts, and spotting which legal theories the facts actually support takes days — and weaknesses hide until opposing counsel finds them.
Structured case understanding, on demand
Case Intelligence reads the matter's documents and produces structured understanding: key facts, a chronology, candidate legal theories, strengths and weaknesses per theory, contradictions in the record, and risk flags — each element traceable to its source document.
It is designed to challenge assumptions: alternative theory candidates surface alongside the obvious one, with the evidence that supports and undermines each.
Working with Case Intelligence
- 1Add the record
Upload filings, correspondence, evidence, and transcripts to the matter or BriefCase.
- 2Run the pipeline
Case Intelligence extracts facts, chronology, issues, and candidate theories from the record.
- 3Interrogate
Ask AskJuri questions scoped to the case — 'what weakens our nuisance theory?' — with answers tied to the record.
- 4Pressure-test
Take the strongest counter-arguments seriously: weaknesses and contradictions are surfaced, not buried.
- 5Act
Route findings into strategy, the What-If Simulator, or brief sections.
Why Case Intelligence is different in JuriSeek
Beyond the obvious theory
Alternative legal theories are proposed with supporting evidence, so strategy exploration is systematic rather than accidental.
Traceable to the record
Every fact, timeline entry, and theory links to source documents — you can audit the analysis.
Adversarial by design
Weaknesses and contradictions are first-class outputs, because the other side will find them anyway.
Capabilities and limitations
What this feature does — and what it deliberately does not claim to do.
- Fact, issue, and chronology extraction from uploaded documents
- Candidate legal theories with supporting and undermining evidence
- Strength/weakness analysis and contradiction detection
- Case-scoped AskJuri questioning
- Hand-off to strategy tools and drafting
- Analysis quality depends on the completeness of the documents you provide.
- Outputs are analytical support, not legal conclusions — validate against the record and your judgment.
- Assessed 'likely outcomes' are analytical hypotheses, not predictions or guarantees.
Case Intelligence questions
Straight answers about scope and limits.
Explore the rest of the platform
See Case Intelligence on your own matter.
Open the workspace and try it, or request a walkthrough with our team.